Judicial conference increases amounts exempt from execution

Article by: Crystal Duplay

Beginning in April 2010, and continuing every 3rd year, the judicial conference shall adjust amounts that are exempt from execution.[i]   This adjustment is based on the consumer price index for all urban consumers or other comparable lists.[ii]  The adjustments include, but are not limited to, exemptions for vehicles, jewelry, wages, and bank attachments.  In 2013, this amount for bank attachments was adjusted from $425.00 to $450.00.  This means that a judgment debtor must have at least $451.00 in her/his/its bank account in order for the judgment creditor to receive any funds from the bank attachment.  The judgment creditor will only receive amounts greater than $450.00.  For example, if the judgment debtor has an account balance of $451.00, the judgment creditor will receive $1.00 on a bank attachment.

In addition to the dollar limitation, Ohio law prevents judgment creditors from attaching funds received from Social Security Retirement or Disability, workers’ compensation, unemployment benefits, or pensions, amongst other types of income.[iii]  It is the burden of the bank to determine if the funds are exempt[iv]; however, not all banks fulfill this burden. If a judgment debtor claims that exempt funds have been attached, the judgment creditor should ask for verification (e.g., request a copy of several months of bank statements).  If the funds are exempt, the judgment creditor should act quickly to release or return the funds to the judgment debtor.

With increasing exemption amounts and court costs, it behooves judgment creditors to diligently research prior to filing an execution.  Sending a subpoena to determine the value of an asset is a critical cost savings tool.  A judgment creditor may also send post judgment discovery requests, including interrogatories, to help identify assets held by a judgment debtor.  The upward adjusted exemption amounts may result in a longer time frame to collect some debts but should not prevent full recovery for the judgment creditor over time.

[i] See O.R.C. § 2329.66.

[ii] Id.

[iii] Id.

[iv] Tillimon v. Wheeler, 2012-Ohio-5804 (2012)

Our Fees

Our fees are competitive and conform to industry standards. In most instances, the following fee arrangements are available:

1. Collection matters are handled on a contingency fee basis, but an hourly option is available and sometimes requested by clients who hold large balance claims. At a clients’ request, fees for collection matters can be billed on a per item flat fee basis for letters, pleadings, motions, and executions.

2. Uncontested foreclosures and related bankruptcy and eviction matters are most often billed on a flat fee basis according to the Fannie Mae guidelines. Contested matters, and counterclaims, generally require additional flat fee or hourly billing, subject to client approval;

3. Uncontested replevin cases are also handled on a flat fee basis. If the right to recover possession is opposed, the matter is converted to an hourly fee basis, upon client approval;

4. Mechanic’s lien matters are treated the same as replevin cases, unless they involve multiple properties, or otherwise relate to unusual subject matter;

5. Our firm is also pioneering the availability and use of alternative fee arrangements (“AFA’s”) for legal services that have traditionally been billed hourly. The availability of AFA’s is a product of our firm’s ambition to deliver legal services in an efficient and cost-effective manner, and help clients more effectively forecast and contain costs. AFA’s are available for an ever expanding range of matters, including litigation defense, discovery disputes, and appellate practice.